Thursday, January 07, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Barber Shop in Chinatown
Nowadays I loathe to have my haircut, that's why I seldom have mine cut, maybe once or twice a year. I went back to Chinatown. I could ...
-
LG just up the ante by introducing its own touch screen cellphone a week after Apple made the iPhone announcement. The PRADA phone is a col...
-
New York City is falling apart .... Buildings are collapsing , the financial market is in a tailspin and the dollar is not the dollar it us...
I remember you shot this road junction before during daytime, buddy, because I'm your biggest fan. Your office must be somewhere nearby. Your previous photo was posted here on November 7, 2009.
ReplyDeleteSid
Can you do an html link with proper <tag> back to that post in the comment?
ReplyDeleteYour previous photo can be found here, buddy.
ReplyDeleteSid
I'm experimenting with the tags you taught me a few years ago:
ReplyDelete<pre>Yahoo!</pre>
Sid
Let me try it
ReplyDeleteDoing html without rendering
<a href="http://www.yahoo.com">yahoo</a>
In your comment, the <pre> tag is actually escaped so it's allowed. I don't think Blogger allows the actual <pre> tag anymore. What it means it's I can show you like this perhaps, I need to try it out live too.
ReplyDeleteto make the "<" you have to type & then followed by lt; without any space, and for ">" you have to type & then followed by gt; with space in between.
Oh well who cares anyway.
You done it, pal. Doing html w/o rendering. Let me try it now.
ReplyDelete<pre>Yahoo!</pre>
I failed. I try again.
ReplyDelete<pre><a href="http://www.google.com">Yahoo!</a></pre>
Sid
I succeeded - only partly - but with the <pre> and </pre> shown as well.
ReplyDeleteSid
I try here to put them on new lines:
ReplyDelete<pre>
<a href=“http://www.google.com”>Yahoo!</a>
</pre>
Sid
I failed yet again, buddy.
ReplyDeleteSid
You don't need the real <pre> tag anymore. You are actually good.
ReplyDeleteI still haven't figured out a way to put the ampersand,l,t then ; as I would have typed it, maybe it can't be done in comment.
Do you know why, pal, the [angular bracket]pre[closed angular bracket] as well as [angular bracket]/pre[closed angular bracket] still remained in my comments, while the same pair of angular brackets you used did not appear in your 10:15AM comment above?
ReplyDeleteBecause I didn't use the pre tag at all. The pre tag is forbidden in comment.
ReplyDeleteThe displayed pre tag is not really a pre tag it's just a literal. When you type it, you type & l t ; pre & g t ; and displayed like this <pre>
OIC. Thanks, buddy, for explaining that to me. It's exactly what happened. One thing is certain, though. I do not know how to use proper tags.
ReplyDeleteSid
As you said, pal, I was good already 'cause at least the thingy between the two pre tags was not rendered.
ReplyDeleteSid