Kodak 160VC. Nikon FE. Nikkor 28mm f/2
The bottom one is scanned by myself using the sucky Epson Perfection V500 Photo. It's straight from the scanner, well except to scale it to the smallish 1818 width to match the paid scanned file from some operation in midtown.
I can understand how I can do such a sloppy job but I just can't understand why people who got paid can do such a sloppy job, am I expecting too much? I look at the negative, they just chop it off somewhere and stuff them in one single sleeve, all 36 exposures in one single sleeve. If it's really you got what you paid for then I don't know how much I have to pay in order to get a modicum degree of professionalism and anal retentiveness from these operators.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Barber Shop in Chinatown
Nowadays I loathe to have my haircut, that's why I seldom have mine cut, maybe once or twice a year. I went back to Chinatown. I could ...
-
Cho produced and sent out a multimedia press release to NBC in the 2 hours between his first shooting and the later mass murder and suicide ...
-
11:50PM. It's ten minutes before midnight. It's another midnight and it's not. It's going to be a spanking new year. Ye...
-
Mr. Tom Ford in a Tom Ford, a 3-piece suit, very anal retentive and very fitted look. Picture by Terry Richardson from the NYTIMES.COM Tom ...
No comments:
Post a Comment