Now I gave a bit more thought, If I had the exposure at the lion, a light object, the flower would be underexposed. And why the hell the flower seems a bit "overexposure." I think it's more about saturation. When I took this one, I cranked up the saturation and sharpness. Never mind.
They are underexposed and appear lighter in colour, i.e. pink, in the lower photograph.
The wizardry of digital imaging is such that you never get to see the real thing. Every aspect of the image can be toned up or down, or even manipulated in whichever way you like.
Holy ghost! The tulips have mutated and changed their colour.
ReplyDeleteSid
You are right, NOT.
ReplyDeleteThe one below had the exposure and focus far back at the lion. The flower is overexposed and out of focus.
I like this one better.
Now I gave a bit more thought, If I had the exposure at the lion, a light object, the flower would be underexposed. And why the hell the flower seems a bit "overexposure." I think it's more about saturation. When I took this one, I cranked up the saturation and sharpness. Never mind.
ReplyDeleteThey are underexposed and appear lighter in colour, i.e. pink, in the lower photograph.
ReplyDeleteThe wizardry of digital imaging is such that you never get to see the real thing. Every aspect of the image can be toned up or down, or even manipulated in whichever way you like.
Sid