Once Upon A Time I Actually Wrote Something

http://writing.colostate.edu/textbooks/informedwriter/chapter5.pdf

The Sartorialist vs. The Style Rookie

What I fear most turns out to be true: The Sartorialist is a pompous prick.  The guy can't write and can't even use the ellipsis without looking clumsy. Basically he is a semi-illiterate.  But that's OKAY.  What is not OKAY, to me,  is his total arrogance and lack of good grace to acknowledge the success of a 15-year old.   Mr. Schuman is intensely original and hard working.  Like what Woody Allen says, being there is half of the success (actually it's more than half, it is eighty percent, "Eighty percent of success is showing up"); I give him that: for being there to take the pictures.  Other than that, he really doesn't have a lot up there photographically speaking; look at his editorial works or ad campaigns, the pictures look stunningly boring and aesthetically banal.  For him to pick on a 15-year old, I guess that just reflects pretty poorly on his part.  And to brag about how much money he makes from AA with that tone, that is just pure class.  If anybody reads anything Miss Gevinson has written, one (OKAY, at least me and myself) has to agree that she is original, smart and sharp for her age or any age for that matter.  And for him to slam her or her success being a conspiracy between her and the print media is just pure libel or extremely ill informed.  I mean The New Yorker has a profile on Miss Gevinson, all seven web pages for what is worth and they don't have one on Mr. Schuman the last I checked.

Tuesday Afternoon

Bostonian hand lasted Berwick Cordovan Oxford.

UPDATE 11/24/2011
I stand corrected.  It should be a pair of Bluchers.

Bike Racing

Crossing the finish line ...

Blundstone 550

Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android

Here is my 5th Blundstones I think. And what's special about this is it isn't Made In Australia(MIA) anymore. And it never was for this model. For the 500 and 510, they were made in Australia when I bought them. They were one of the few shoes or boots that actually fit me and I like. This 550 is supposed to be an improvement over the 500/510 series, leather lined and extra insoles for additional padding or replacement. In terms of kip leather, from what I can recall, the MIA 500/510 leather is greasier. This 550, made in Vietnam, has more of a papery feel to it. Is it better, same or worse, I can't say objectively but I would say it's a touch worse off than before. The MIA 500/510 has no or minimum leather lining inside the boots. Minimum, because there is a thumb sized leather lining on the front pull. This 550 has more leather lining so it's supposed to be easier to put on and take off and more comfortable. Though the inside (or called vamp) near or in the toe box is not lined with leather but some sort of fabric which I of course have no idea what it is. I read somewhere that the sizing of the 550 is supposed to be slightly roomier than the 500/510, not that the latter is not roomy though. I think the 550 is at least as roomy as the 500/510, which is important for people who have full sized feet (read: wide, high-instep and meaty feet). Does it matter Blundstones aren't MIA anymore? I will leave it up to you. But I have a difficult time finding the country of origin for 550. When I wrote to Zappos, the good folks there cheerfully told me to contact Blundstone directly and I thought they could just open a box and see what it says, so much so for customer service. In the end I contacted Blundstone and someone told me that it was manufactured some where not in down under. And another seemingly knowledgeable eBay seller also confirms that. The official Blundstone rep went extra step to infer that I was disappointed to find out that it was no longer manufactured in Australia. You know maybe that's true too. But I guess if even the brand doesn't take great pride in where their products are manufactured by being upfront, they shouldn't expect their customers to be.  I just want the brand to take pride of its production partners themselves, whether they are in China, Vietnam or Thailand.

11/17/2018
I don't have a lot to update.  But I'd just like to add that it's almost common knowledge that the soles can turn into tofu or sort for I don't know why.  Apparently it didn't happen to all of my Blundstones during the time I wore them, which was like decades ago but I did have that experience.  I don't know if Blundstones ever cared to address them.  I don't know.

And I just went to the Blundstone USA site.  Again, the site makes no mention where the boots are made, so there you have it.  If you think the quality is the same or better, say it out with pride.  I stopped wearing Blundstones because they just don't fit me that well now.  I still remember the time I bought them online via eBay from a seller from Australia.  I got a toy koala bear with it too.  The seller had since been gone for a long time.

Nikon 1 in Vomit Pink

Pepto-Bismol should make it their house camera.

Gotta have it.

from dcwatch via nikonrumors.

Nikon Lens Super-quite[sic] Autofocus - 1 Nikkor VR 10-100mm

1 Nikkor VR 10-100mm f/4.5-5.6 PD-ZOOM


Snipped from Nikon-Europe

It is super-quite[sic].  Despite the super superlative.  It's still quite, meaning not really there yet.  So be prepared to manual focus.  Or simply buy a manual focus lens on eBay or Craigslist.  If you want quiet autofocusing you have to get the STM lenses.  All other lenses that have the Stepping Motor (STM) are written as super-quiet.  Though I don't understand why Nikon put the (STM) after "Stepping" instead of "Stepping Motor."

UPDATE: 12/30/2011
It's still "super-quite."  It looks like that's the correct way to say it as Nikon Europe has no problem with it.  Or they think the lens will be so short lived or nobody is buying or researching it so why bother correcting it. Bravo.

Apple Picking

These are scanned by yours truly using the state of the art crappy Epson Perfection V500 Photo running the iScan software on a AMD64 Ubuntu 11.04 machine.

220 FUJI RDP III PROVIA 100F.  I should have bought more of these.
Notice all the dust.  Scanning film is a pain.  And I am such a masochist.

Apple Picking

Randolph Engineering and American Optical

On the front, Randolph Engineering.  Back then they didn't need big logo.

In the back, the AO Original Pilot.

 Randolph Engineering bridge size emboss on lower bridge

Randolph arm, or bayonet, both left and right bears the same emboss.  In fact, there is no left or right, that's why one (left) arm's emboss appears upside down.

 AO right arm or bayonet from the eye facing side.

 AO left arm or bayonet from the eye facing side.

AO emboss on the upper bridge.

All shots are on tripod.  Unfortunately the arm shots were handheld, meaning, I held the arms of the glasses to move it back and forth in front of the lens to get to minimum focus distance.  Anyway, not the sharpest because of minute handshake.

People are demanding I make a comparison so here they are.  I thought I lost the AO but I actually had it misplaced.  This AO 57-20 is steel color and I have another newer AO pair that is smaller and in gold colored, 55-20 AO on the bridge, minus the USA emboss, on the right arm it says AO Eyewear, Inc.  no USA either.  So I am not sure if AO is still made in the USA, actually with just USA doesn't mean it's manufactured in the USA anyway.

Having lunch with my F-1

Canon F-1 Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android

120 Film

and a 220 too. Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android